Whiskering of pointed homotopies with respect to composition of pointed maps
Content created by Egbert Rijke.
Created on 2024-03-13.
Last modified on 2024-03-13.
module structured-types.whiskering-pointed-homotopies-composition where
Imports
open import foundation.action-on-identifications-binary-functions open import foundation.action-on-identifications-functions open import foundation.commuting-squares-of-identifications open import foundation.commuting-triangles-of-identifications open import foundation.dependent-pair-types open import foundation.homotopies open import foundation.identity-types open import foundation.universe-levels open import foundation.whiskering-homotopies-composition open import foundation.whiskering-identifications-concatenation open import structured-types.pointed-2-homotopies open import structured-types.pointed-families-of-types open import structured-types.pointed-homotopies open import structured-types.pointed-maps open import structured-types.pointed-types
Idea
The whiskering operations of pointed homotopies with respect to composition of pointed maps are two operations that produce pointed homotopies between composites of pointed maps from either a pointed homotopy on the left or on the right of the composition.
-
Consider a pointed homotopy
H : f ~∗ g
between pointed mapsf g : A →∗ B
, and consider a pointed maph : B →∗ C
, as indicated in the diagramf -----> h A -----> B -----> C. g
The left whiskering operation on pointed homotopies¶ of
h
andH
is a pointed homotopyh ·l∗ H : h ∘∗ f ~∗ h ∘∗ g.
-
Consider a pointed map
f : A →∗ B
and consider a pointed homotopyH : g ~∗ g
between tw pointed mapsg h : B →∗ C
, as indicated in the diagramg f -----> A -----> B -----> C. h
The right whiskering operation on pointed homotopies¶ of
H
andf
is a pointed homotopyH ·r∗ f : g ∘∗ f ~∗ h ∘∗ f.
Definitions
Left whiskering of pointed homotopies
Consider two pointed maps f := (f₀ , f₁) : A →∗ B
and
g := (g₀ , g₁) : A →∗ B
equipped with a pointed homotopy
H := (H₀ , H₁) : f ~∗ g
, and consider furthermore a pointed map
h := (h₀ , h₁) : B →∗ C
. Then we construct a pointed homotopy
h ·l∗ H : (h ∘∗ f) ~∗ (h ∘∗ g).
Construction. The underlying homotopy of h ·l∗ H
is the whiskered homotpy
h₀ ·l H₀.
For the coherence, we have to show that the triangle
ap h₀ (H₀ *)
h₀ (f₀ *) ------------> h₀ (g₀ *)
\ /
ap h₀ f₁ \ / ap h₀ g₁
∨ ∨
h₀ * h₀ *
\ /
h₁ \ / h₁
∨ ∨
∗
commutes. By right whiskering of commuting triangles of identifications with respect to concatenation it suffices to show that the triangle
ap h₀ (H₀ *)
h₀ (f₀ *) ---------> h₀ (g₀ *)
\ /
ap h₀ f₁ \ / ap h₀ g₁
\ /
∨ ∨
h₀ *
commutes. By functoriality of commuting triangles of identifications, this follows from the fact that the triangle
H₀ *
f₀ * ------> g₀ *
\ /
f₁ \ / g₁
\ /
∨ ∨
*
commutes.
module _ {l1 l2 l3 : Level} {A : Pointed-Type l1} {B : Pointed-Type l2} {C : Pointed-Type l3} (h : B →∗ C) (f g : A →∗ B) (H : f ~∗ g) where htpy-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy : map-comp-pointed-map h f ~ map-comp-pointed-map h g htpy-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy = map-pointed-map h ·l htpy-pointed-htpy H coherence-point-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy : coherence-point-unpointed-htpy-pointed-Π ( h ∘∗ f) ( h ∘∗ g) ( htpy-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy) coherence-point-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy = right-whisker-concat-coherence-triangle-identifications ( ap (map-pointed-map h) (preserves-point-pointed-map f)) ( ap (map-pointed-map h) (preserves-point-pointed-map g)) ( ap ( map-pointed-map h) ( htpy-pointed-htpy H (point-Pointed-Type A))) ( preserves-point-pointed-map h) ( map-coherence-triangle-identifications ( map-pointed-map h) ( preserves-point-pointed-map f) ( preserves-point-pointed-map g) ( htpy-pointed-htpy H (point-Pointed-Type A)) ( coherence-point-pointed-htpy H)) left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy : h ∘∗ f ~∗ h ∘∗ g pr1 left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy = htpy-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy pr2 left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy = coherence-point-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy
Right whiskering of pointed homotopies
Consider a pointed map f := (f₀ , f₁) : A →∗ B
and two pointed maps
g := (g₀ , g₁) : B →∗ C
and h := (h₀ , h₁) : B →∗ C
equipped with a pointed
homotopy H := (H₀ , H₁) : g ~∗ h
. Then we construct a pointed homotopy
H ·r∗ f : (g ∘∗ f) ~∗ (h ∘∗ f).
Construction. The underlying homotopy of H ·r∗ f
is the homotopy
H₀ ·r f₀ : (g₀ ∘ f₀) ~ (h₀ ∘ f₀).
Then we have to show that the outer triangle in the diagram
H₀ (f₀ *)
g₀ (f₀ *) ------------> h₀ (f₀ *)
\ /
ap g₀ f₁ \ / ap h₀ f₁
∨ H₀ * ∨
g₀ * ----> h₀ *
\ /
g₁ \ / h₁
∨ ∨
∗
commutes. This is done by vertically pasting the upper square and the lower
triangle. The upper square commutes by inverse naturality of the homotopy H₀
.
The lower triangle is the base point coherence H₁
of the pointed homotopy
H ≐ (H₀ , H₁)
.
module _ {l1 l2 l3 : Level} {A : Pointed-Type l1} {B : Pointed-Type l2} {C : Pointed-Type l3} (g1 g2 : B →∗ C) (H : g1 ~∗ g2) (f : A →∗ B) where htpy-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy : unpointed-htpy-pointed-Π (g1 ∘∗ f) (g2 ∘∗ f) htpy-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy = htpy-pointed-htpy H ·r map-pointed-map f coherence-point-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy : coherence-point-unpointed-htpy-pointed-Π ( g1 ∘∗ f) ( g2 ∘∗ f) ( htpy-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy) coherence-point-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy = vertical-pasting-coherence-square-coherence-triangle-identifications ( htpy-pointed-htpy H _) ( ap (map-pointed-map g1) _) ( ap (map-pointed-map g2) _) ( htpy-pointed-htpy H _) ( preserves-point-pointed-map g1) ( preserves-point-pointed-map g2) ( inv-nat-htpy (htpy-pointed-htpy H) _) ( coherence-point-pointed-htpy H) right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy : g1 ∘∗ f ~∗ g2 ∘∗ f pr1 right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy = htpy-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy pr2 right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy = coherence-point-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy
Properties
Computing the left whiskering of the reflexive pointed homotopy
module _ {l1 l2 l3 : Level} {A : Pointed-Type l1} {B : Pointed-Type l2} {C : Pointed-Type l3} (h : B →∗ C) (f : A →∗ B) where compute-refl-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy : pointed-2-htpy ( left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy h f f (refl-pointed-htpy f)) ( refl-pointed-htpy (h ∘∗ f)) compute-refl-left-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy = refl-pointed-2-htpy (refl-pointed-htpy (h ∘∗ f))
Computing the right whiskering of the reflexive pointed homotopy
Consider two pointed maps f := (f₀ , f₁) : A →∗ B
and
g := (g₀ , g₁) : B →∗ C
. We are constructing a pointed 2
-homotopy
right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy (refl-pointed-htpy h) f ~∗
refl-pointed-htpy (g ∘∗ f)
The underlying homotopy of this pointed 2
-homotopy is refl-htpy
. The base
point coherence of this homotopy is an identification witnessing that the
triangle
H₁
ap g₀ f₁ ∙ g₁ ------> refl ∙ (ap g₀ f₁ ∙ g₁)
\ /
refl \ / right-whisker-concat refl (ap g₀ f₁ ∙ g₁) ≐ refl
\ /
∨ ∨
refl ∙ (ap g₀ f₁ ∙ g₁)
commutes. Here, the identification H₁
is the vertical pasting of the upper
square and the lower triangle in the diagram
refl
g₀ (f₀ *) ------------> g₀ (f₀ *)
\ /
ap g₀ f₁ \ / ap g₀ f₁
∨ refl ∨
g₀ * ----> g₀ *
\ /
g₁ \ / g₁
∨ ∨
∗.
The upper square in this diagram is the inverse naturality of the reflexive
homotopy refl-htpy
and the lower triangle in this diagram is the reflexive
identification.
Recall that the inverse naturality of the reflexive homotopy
inv-nat-htpy refl-htpy f₁
computes to the horizontally constant square of
identifications. Furthermore, the vertical pasting of the horizontally constant
square right-unit
and any commuting triangle refl
computes to refl
.
Therefore it follows that the identification H₁
above is equal to refl
, as
was required to show.
module _ {l1 l2 l3 : Level} {A : Pointed-Type l1} {B : Pointed-Type l2} {C : Pointed-Type l3} (h : B →∗ C) (f : A →∗ B) where htpy-compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy : unpointed-htpy-pointed-htpy ( right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy h h (refl-pointed-htpy h) f) ( refl-pointed-htpy (h ∘∗ f)) htpy-compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy = refl-htpy coherence-point-compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy : coherence-point-unpointed-htpy-pointed-htpy ( right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy h h (refl-pointed-htpy h) f) ( refl-pointed-htpy (h ∘∗ f)) ( htpy-compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy) coherence-point-compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy = inv ( ( right-unit) ∙ ( ( ap ( λ t → vertical-pasting-coherence-square-coherence-triangle-identifications ( refl) ( ap (map-pointed-map h) (preserves-point-pointed-map f)) ( ap (map-pointed-map h) (preserves-point-pointed-map f)) ( refl) ( preserves-point-pointed-map h) ( preserves-point-pointed-map h) ( t) ( refl)) ( inv-nat-refl-htpy ( map-pointed-map h) ( preserves-point-pointed-map f))) ∙ ( right-whisker-concat-horizontal-refl-coherence-square-identifications ( ap (map-pointed-map h) (preserves-point-pointed-map f)) ( preserves-point-pointed-map h)))) compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy : pointed-2-htpy ( right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy h h (refl-pointed-htpy h) f) ( refl-pointed-htpy (h ∘∗ f)) pr1 compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy = htpy-compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy pr2 compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy = coherence-point-compute-refl-right-whisker-comp-pointed-htpy
Recent changes
- 2024-03-13. Egbert Rijke. Refactoring pointed types (#1056).