The universal property of the integers
Content created by Fredrik Bakke, Egbert Rijke and Vojtěch Štěpančík.
Created on 2023-08-28.
Last modified on 2024-02-06.
module elementary-number-theory.universal-property-integers where
Imports
open import elementary-number-theory.integers open import elementary-number-theory.natural-numbers open import foundation.cartesian-product-types open import foundation.contractible-types open import foundation.coproduct-types open import foundation.dependent-pair-types open import foundation.equivalences open import foundation.function-types open import foundation.functoriality-dependent-pair-types open import foundation.fundamental-theorem-of-identity-types open import foundation.homotopies open import foundation.homotopy-induction open import foundation.identity-types open import foundation.propositions open import foundation.structure-identity-principle open import foundation.torsorial-type-families open import foundation.universe-levels
Idea
The universal property of the integers
states that given any type X
equipped with a point x : X
and an
automorphism e : X ≃ X
, there is a
unique structure preserving map from ℤ
to
X
.
abstract elim-ℤ : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → ( k : ℤ) → P k elim-ℤ P p0 pS (inl zero-ℕ) = map-inv-is-equiv (is-equiv-map-equiv (pS neg-one-ℤ)) p0 elim-ℤ P p0 pS (inl (succ-ℕ x)) = map-inv-is-equiv ( is-equiv-map-equiv (pS (inl (succ-ℕ x)))) ( elim-ℤ P p0 pS (inl x)) elim-ℤ P p0 pS (inr (inl _)) = p0 elim-ℤ P p0 pS (inr (inr zero-ℕ)) = map-equiv (pS zero-ℤ) p0 elim-ℤ P p0 pS (inr (inr (succ-ℕ x))) = map-equiv ( pS (inr (inr x))) ( elim-ℤ P p0 pS (inr (inr x))) compute-zero-elim-ℤ : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → Id (elim-ℤ P p0 pS zero-ℤ) p0 compute-zero-elim-ℤ P p0 pS = refl compute-succ-elim-ℤ : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) (k : ℤ) → Id (elim-ℤ P p0 pS (succ-ℤ k)) (map-equiv (pS k) (elim-ℤ P p0 pS k)) compute-succ-elim-ℤ P p0 pS (inl zero-ℕ) = inv ( is-section-map-inv-is-equiv ( is-equiv-map-equiv (pS (inl zero-ℕ))) ( elim-ℤ P p0 pS (succ-ℤ (inl zero-ℕ)))) compute-succ-elim-ℤ P p0 pS (inl (succ-ℕ x)) = inv ( is-section-map-inv-is-equiv ( is-equiv-map-equiv (pS (inl (succ-ℕ x)))) ( elim-ℤ P p0 pS (succ-ℤ (inl (succ-ℕ x))))) compute-succ-elim-ℤ P p0 pS (inr (inl _)) = refl compute-succ-elim-ℤ P p0 pS (inr (inr _)) = refl ELIM-ℤ : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → UU l1 ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS = Σ ( (k : ℤ) → P k) ( λ f → ( ( Id (f zero-ℤ) p0) × ( (k : ℤ) → Id (f (succ-ℤ k)) ((map-equiv (pS k)) (f k))))) Elim-ℤ : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS pr1 (Elim-ℤ P p0 pS) = elim-ℤ P p0 pS pr1 (pr2 (Elim-ℤ P p0 pS)) = compute-zero-elim-ℤ P p0 pS pr2 (pr2 (Elim-ℤ P p0 pS)) = compute-succ-elim-ℤ P p0 pS equiv-comparison-map-Eq-ELIM-ℤ : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → ( s t : ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS) (k : ℤ) → Id ((pr1 s) k) ((pr1 t) k) ≃ Id ((pr1 s) (succ-ℤ k)) ((pr1 t) (succ-ℤ k)) equiv-comparison-map-Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s t k = ( ( equiv-concat (pr2 (pr2 s) k) (pr1 t (succ-ℤ k))) ∘e ( equiv-concat' (map-equiv (pS k) (pr1 s k)) (inv (pr2 (pr2 t) k)))) ∘e ( equiv-ap (pS k) (pr1 s k) (pr1 t k)) zero-Eq-ELIM-ℤ : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → ( s t : ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS) (H : (pr1 s) ~ (pr1 t)) → UU l1 zero-Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s t H = Id (H zero-ℤ) ((pr1 (pr2 s)) ∙ (inv (pr1 (pr2 t)))) succ-Eq-ELIM-ℤ : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → ( s t : ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS) (H : (pr1 s) ~ (pr1 t)) → UU l1 succ-Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s t H = ( k : ℤ) → Id ( H (succ-ℤ k)) ( map-equiv (equiv-comparison-map-Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s t k) (H k)) Eq-ELIM-ℤ : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → ( s t : ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS) → UU l1 Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s t = ELIM-ℤ ( λ k → Id (pr1 s k) (pr1 t k)) ( (pr1 (pr2 s)) ∙ (inv (pr1 (pr2 t)))) ( equiv-comparison-map-Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s t) reflexive-Eq-ELIM-ℤ : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → ( s : ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS) → Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s s pr1 (reflexive-Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS (f , p , H)) = refl-htpy pr1 (pr2 (reflexive-Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS (f , p , H))) = inv (right-inv p) pr2 (pr2 (reflexive-Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS (f , p , H))) = inv ∘ (right-inv ∘ H) Eq-ELIM-ℤ-eq : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) → ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → ( s t : ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS) → Id s t → Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s t Eq-ELIM-ℤ-eq P p0 pS s .s refl = reflexive-Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s abstract is-torsorial-Eq-ELIM-ℤ : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) → ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → ( s : ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS) → is-torsorial (Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s) is-torsorial-Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s = is-torsorial-Eq-structure ( is-torsorial-htpy (pr1 s)) ( pair (pr1 s) refl-htpy) ( is-torsorial-Eq-structure ( is-contr-is-equiv' ( Σ (Id (pr1 s zero-ℤ) p0) (λ α → Id α (pr1 (pr2 s)))) ( tot (λ α → right-transpose-eq-concat refl α (pr1 (pr2 s)))) ( is-equiv-tot-is-fiberwise-equiv ( λ α → is-equiv-right-transpose-eq-concat refl α (pr1 (pr2 s)))) ( is-torsorial-Id' (pr1 (pr2 s)))) ( pair (pr1 (pr2 s)) (inv (right-inv (pr1 (pr2 s))))) ( is-contr-is-equiv' ( Σ ( ( k : ℤ) → Id (pr1 s (succ-ℤ k)) (pr1 (pS k) (pr1 s k))) ( λ β → β ~ (pr2 (pr2 s)))) ( tot (λ β → right-transpose-htpy-concat refl-htpy β (pr2 (pr2 s)))) ( is-equiv-tot-is-fiberwise-equiv ( λ β → is-equiv-right-transpose-htpy-concat refl-htpy β (pr2 (pr2 s)))) ( is-torsorial-htpy' (pr2 (pr2 s))))) abstract is-equiv-Eq-ELIM-ℤ-eq : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) → ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → ( s t : ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS) → is-equiv (Eq-ELIM-ℤ-eq P p0 pS s t) is-equiv-Eq-ELIM-ℤ-eq P p0 pS s = fundamental-theorem-id ( is-torsorial-Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s) ( Eq-ELIM-ℤ-eq P p0 pS s) eq-Eq-ELIM-ℤ : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) → ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → ( s t : ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS) → Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s t → Id s t eq-Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s t = map-inv-is-equiv (is-equiv-Eq-ELIM-ℤ-eq P p0 pS s t) abstract is-prop-ELIM-ℤ : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) → ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → is-prop (ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS) is-prop-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS = is-prop-all-elements-equal ( λ s t → eq-Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s t ( Elim-ℤ ( λ k → Id (pr1 s k) (pr1 t k)) ( (pr1 (pr2 s)) ∙ (inv (pr1 (pr2 t)))) ( equiv-comparison-map-Eq-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS s t)))
The dependent universal property of the integers
abstract is-contr-ELIM-ℤ : { l1 : Level} (P : ℤ → UU l1) → ( p0 : P zero-ℤ) (pS : (k : ℤ) → (P k) ≃ (P (succ-ℤ k))) → is-contr (ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS) is-contr-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS = is-proof-irrelevant-is-prop (is-prop-ELIM-ℤ P p0 pS) (Elim-ℤ P p0 pS)
The universal property of the integers
The nondependent universal property of the integers is a special case of the dependent universal property applied to constant type families.
ELIM-ℤ' : { l1 : Level} {X : UU l1} (x : X) (e : X ≃ X) → UU l1 ELIM-ℤ' {X = X} x e = ELIM-ℤ (λ k → X) x (λ k → e) abstract universal-property-ℤ : { l1 : Level} {X : UU l1} (x : X) (e : X ≃ X) → is-contr (ELIM-ℤ' x e) universal-property-ℤ {X = X} x e = is-contr-ELIM-ℤ (λ k → X) x (λ k → e)
Recent changes
- 2024-02-06. Egbert Rijke and Fredrik Bakke. Refactor files about identity types and homotopies (#1014).
- 2024-01-31. Fredrik Bakke. Rename
is-torsorial-path
tois-torsorial-Id
(#1016). - 2024-01-11. Fredrik Bakke. Make type family implicit for
is-torsorial-Eq-structure
andis-torsorial-Eq-Π
(#995). - 2023-10-21. Egbert Rijke and Fredrik Bakke. Implement
is-torsorial
throughout the library (#875). - 2023-10-21. Egbert Rijke. Rename
is-contr-total
tois-torsorial
(#871).