Well-founded relations
Content created by Daniel Gratzer, Egbert Rijke, Elisabeth Stenholm and Fredrik Bakke.
Created on 2023-11-27.
Last modified on 2024-04-11.
module order-theory.well-founded-relations where
Imports
open import foundation.binary-relations open import foundation.dependent-pair-types open import foundation.propositions open import foundation.universe-levels open import order-theory.accessible-elements-relations
Idea
Given a type X
equipped with a
binary relation _ϵ_ : X → X → Type
we say
that the relation _ϵ_
is well-founded if all elements of X
are
accessible with respect to
_ϵ_
.
Well-founded relations satisfy an induction principle: In order to construct an
element of P x
for all x : X
it suffices to construct an element of P y
for all elements y ϵ x
. More precisely, the well-founded induction
principle is a function
(x : X) → ((y : Y) → y ϵ x → P y) → P x.
Definitions
The predicate of being a well-founded relation
module _ {l1 l2 : Level} {X : UU l1} (_ϵ_ : Relation l2 X) where is-well-founded-prop-Relation : Prop (l1 ⊔ l2) is-well-founded-prop-Relation = Π-Prop X (is-accessible-element-prop-Relation _ϵ_) is-well-founded-Relation : UU (l1 ⊔ l2) is-well-founded-Relation = (x : X) → is-accessible-element-Relation _ϵ_ x
Well-founded relations
Well-Founded-Relation : {l1 : Level} (l2 : Level) → UU l1 → UU (l1 ⊔ lsuc l2) Well-Founded-Relation l X = Σ (Relation l X) is-well-founded-Relation module _ {l1 l2 : Level} {X : UU l1} (R : Well-Founded-Relation l2 X) where rel-Well-Founded-Relation : Relation l2 X rel-Well-Founded-Relation = pr1 R is-well-founded-Well-Founded-Relation : is-well-founded-Relation rel-Well-Founded-Relation is-well-founded-Well-Founded-Relation = pr2 R
Properties
Well-founded induction
module _ {l1 l2 l3 : Level} {X : UU l1} ((_ϵ_ , w) : Well-Founded-Relation l2 X) (P : X → UU l3) where ind-Well-Founded-Relation : ({x : X} → ({y : X} → y ϵ x → P y) → P x) → (x : X) → P x ind-Well-Founded-Relation IH x = ind-accessible-element-Relation _ϵ_ P (λ _ → IH) (w x)
A well-founded relation is asymmetric (and thus irreflexive)
module _ {l1 l2 : Level} {X : UU l1} ((_ϵ_ , w) : Well-Founded-Relation l2 X) where is-asymmetric-Well-Founded-Relation : is-asymmetric _ϵ_ is-asymmetric-Well-Founded-Relation x y = is-asymmetric-is-accessible-element-Relation _ϵ_ (w x) module _ {l1 l2 : Level} {X : UU l1} (ϵ : Well-Founded-Relation l2 X) where is-irreflexive-Well-Founded-Relation : is-irreflexive (rel-Well-Founded-Relation ϵ) is-irreflexive-Well-Founded-Relation = is-irreflexive-is-asymmetric ( rel-Well-Founded-Relation ϵ) ( is-asymmetric-Well-Founded-Relation ϵ)
Recent changes
- 2024-04-11. Fredrik Bakke. Strict symmetrizations of binary relations (#1025).
- 2023-11-27. Elisabeth Stenholm, Daniel Gratzer and Egbert Rijke. Additions during work on material set theory in HoTT (#910).