Library UniMath.CategoryTheory.SplitMonicsAndEpis
Require Import UniMath.Foundations.PartD.
Require Import UniMath.Foundations.Propositions.
Require Import UniMath.MoreFoundations.Tactics.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.Core.Categories.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.Core.Isos.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.Core.Functors.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.Monics.
Require Import UniMath.CategoryTheory.Epis.
Local Open Scope cat.
Split monomorphisms
A choice of a section for the given morphism
Definition is_split_monic (m : A --> B) : UU :=
∑ r : B --> A, is_retraction m r.
Definition split_monic : UU :=
∑ m : A --> B, is_split_monic m.
Lemma split_monic_is_monic (m : A --> B) :
is_split_monic m → isMonic m.
Proof.
intros is_split.
apply (isMonic_postcomp _ m (pr1 is_split)).
apply (transportf _ (!pr2 is_split)).
apply identity_isMonic.
Qed.
∑ r : B --> A, is_retraction m r.
Definition split_monic : UU :=
∑ m : A --> B, is_split_monic m.
Lemma split_monic_is_monic (m : A --> B) :
is_split_monic m → isMonic m.
Proof.
intros is_split.
apply (isMonic_postcomp _ m (pr1 is_split)).
apply (transportf _ (!pr2 is_split)).
apply identity_isMonic.
Qed.
We provide a coercion to Monic C A B, rather than A --> B, as it is
more generally useful (Monic C A B coerces to A --> B).
Definition split_monic_to_monic (m : split_monic) : Monic C A B.
Proof.
use make_Monic.
- exact (pr1 m).
- abstract (apply split_monic_is_monic; exact (pr2 m)).
Defined.
Coercion split_monic_to_monic : split_monic >-> Monic.
Proof.
use make_Monic.
- exact (pr1 m).
- abstract (apply split_monic_is_monic; exact (pr2 m)).
Defined.
Coercion split_monic_to_monic : split_monic >-> Monic.
The chosen section is not necessarily unique
Lemma isaset_is_split_monic (m : A --> B) :
has_homsets C → isaset (is_split_monic m).
Proof.
intro; apply isaset_total2; [auto|].
intros.
apply hlevelntosn; apply isaprop_is_retraction.
assumption.
Qed.
has_homsets C → isaset (is_split_monic m).
Proof.
intro; apply isaset_total2; [auto|].
intros.
apply hlevelntosn; apply isaprop_is_retraction.
assumption.
Qed.
Now, for the "more classical" definition
Definition is_merely_split_monic (m : A --> B) : hProp.
Proof.
use make_hProp.
- exact (∥ ∑ r : B --> A, is_retraction m r ∥).
- apply isapropishinh.
Defined.
Definition merely_split_monic : UU :=
∑ m : A --> B, is_merely_split_monic m.
Since coercing this to a Monic requires an extra hypothesis
(that C) has homsets, we just coerce to an arrow instead.
Definition merely_split_monic_to_morphism (m : merely_split_monic) : A --> B :=
pr1 m.
Coercion merely_split_monic_to_morphism :
merely_split_monic >-> precategory_morphisms.
Lemma isaset_merely_split_monic (m : A --> B) :
has_homsets C → isaset merely_split_monic.
Proof.
intro.
apply isaset_total2; [auto|].
intro; apply hlevelntosn, propproperty.
Qed.
pr1 m.
Coercion merely_split_monic_to_morphism :
merely_split_monic >-> precategory_morphisms.
Lemma isaset_merely_split_monic (m : A --> B) :
has_homsets C → isaset merely_split_monic.
Proof.
intro.
apply isaset_total2; [auto|].
intro; apply hlevelntosn, propproperty.
Qed.
For the purposes of proving a proposition, we can assume a merely split
monic has a chosen section.
Lemma merely_split_monic_to_split_monic {X : UU} (m : A --> B) :
isaprop X → (is_split_monic m → X) → is_merely_split_monic m → X.
Proof.
intros isx impl mere.
refine (factor_through_squash isx _ mere).
assumption.
Qed.
isaprop X → (is_split_monic m → X) → is_merely_split_monic m → X.
Proof.
intros isx impl mere.
refine (factor_through_squash isx _ mere).
assumption.
Qed.
Note that this requires that C has homsets, in contrast
to the above statement for "non-mere" monics.
Lemma merely_split_monic_is_monic (m : A --> B) :
has_homsets C → is_merely_split_monic m → isMonic m.
Proof.
intros H.
apply merely_split_monic_to_split_monic.
- apply isapropisMonic; auto.
- apply split_monic_is_monic.
Qed.
Definition merely_split_monic_to_monic {hsC : has_homsets C} :
merely_split_monic → Monic C A B.
Proof.
intros m.
use make_Monic.
- exact (pr1 m).
- abstract (apply merely_split_monic_is_monic; [auto|]; exact (pr2 m)).
Qed.
has_homsets C → is_merely_split_monic m → isMonic m.
Proof.
intros H.
apply merely_split_monic_to_split_monic.
- apply isapropisMonic; auto.
- apply split_monic_is_monic.
Qed.
Definition merely_split_monic_to_monic {hsC : has_homsets C} :
merely_split_monic → Monic C A B.
Proof.
intros m.
use make_Monic.
- exact (pr1 m).
- abstract (apply merely_split_monic_is_monic; [auto|]; exact (pr2 m)).
Qed.
Equivalent definitions
For the truncated version, this is an equivalence (see below). However,
in general, choosing a section is stronger.
Lemma is_split_monic_to_precomp_is_surjection (m : A --> B) :
is_split_monic m → ∏ c : ob C, issurjective (@precomp_with _ _ _ m c).
Proof.
intros is_split c f.
apply hinhpr.
unfold hfiber, precomp_with.
∃ (pr1 is_split · f).
refine (assoc _ _ _ @ _).
refine (maponpaths (fun z ⇒ z · _) (pr2 is_split) @ _).
apply id_left.
Qed.
Lemma is_merely_split_monic_weq_precomp_is_surjection (m : A --> B) :
is_merely_split_monic m ↔
∏ c : ob C, issurjective (@precomp_with _ _ _ m c).
Proof.
unfold is_split_monic.
split.
- intros is_split ?.
apply (merely_split_monic_to_split_monic m).
+ apply isapropissurjective.
+ intro; apply is_split_monic_to_precomp_is_surjection.
assumption.
+ assumption.
- intros is_surjective.
specialize (is_surjective _ (identity _)).
refine (factor_through_squash _ _ is_surjective).
+ apply propproperty.
+ intro fib.
apply hinhpr.
∃ (pr1 fib).
apply (pr2 fib).
Qed.
End SplitMonic.
Arguments split_monic {_} _ _.
Arguments merely_split_monic {_} _ _.
is_split_monic m → ∏ c : ob C, issurjective (@precomp_with _ _ _ m c).
Proof.
intros is_split c f.
apply hinhpr.
unfold hfiber, precomp_with.
∃ (pr1 is_split · f).
refine (assoc _ _ _ @ _).
refine (maponpaths (fun z ⇒ z · _) (pr2 is_split) @ _).
apply id_left.
Qed.
Lemma is_merely_split_monic_weq_precomp_is_surjection (m : A --> B) :
is_merely_split_monic m ↔
∏ c : ob C, issurjective (@precomp_with _ _ _ m c).
Proof.
unfold is_split_monic.
split.
- intros is_split ?.
apply (merely_split_monic_to_split_monic m).
+ apply isapropissurjective.
+ intro; apply is_split_monic_to_precomp_is_surjection.
assumption.
+ assumption.
- intros is_surjective.
specialize (is_surjective _ (identity _)).
refine (factor_through_squash _ _ is_surjective).
+ apply propproperty.
+ intro fib.
apply hinhpr.
∃ (pr1 fib).
apply (pr2 fib).
Qed.
End SplitMonic.
Arguments split_monic {_} _ _.
Arguments merely_split_monic {_} _ _.
Functors preserve merely split monomorphisms
Lemma functor_preserves_merely_split_monic {C D : precategory} (F : functor C D)
{A B : ob C} (f : C⟦A,B⟧) :
is_merely_split_monic f → is_merely_split_monic (# F f).
Proof.
apply hinhfun.
intro hf.
∃ (#F (pr1 hf)).
unfold is_retraction.
now rewrite <- functor_id, <- (pr2 hf), <- functor_comp.
Qed.
{A B : ob C} (f : C⟦A,B⟧) :
is_merely_split_monic f → is_merely_split_monic (# F f).
Proof.
apply hinhfun.
intro hf.
∃ (#F (pr1 hf)).
unfold is_retraction.
now rewrite <- functor_id, <- (pr2 hf), <- functor_comp.
Qed.
Functors preserve split monomorphisms
Lemma functor_preserves_split_monic {C D : precategory} (F : functor C D)
{A B : ob C} (f : C⟦A,B⟧) :
is_split_monic f → is_split_monic (# F f).
Proof.
intro hf.
∃ (#F (pr1 hf)).
unfold is_retraction.
now rewrite <- functor_id, <- (pr2 hf), <- functor_comp.
Qed.
{A B : ob C} (f : C⟦A,B⟧) :
is_split_monic f → is_split_monic (# F f).
Proof.
intro hf.
∃ (#F (pr1 hf)).
unfold is_retraction.
now rewrite <- functor_id, <- (pr2 hf), <- functor_comp.
Qed.
An epic split monic is an iso.
Lemma merely_split_monic_is_epi_to_is_iso
{C : category} {A B : ob C} (m : A --> B) :
is_merely_split_monic m → isEpi m → is_iso m.
Proof.
intros is_monic is_epi c.
apply isweqinclandsurj.
- apply precomp_with_epi_isincl; assumption.
- apply is_merely_split_monic_weq_precomp_is_surjection.
assumption.
Qed.
{C : category} {A B : ob C} (m : A --> B) :
is_merely_split_monic m → isEpi m → is_iso m.
Proof.
intros is_monic is_epi c.
apply isweqinclandsurj.
- apply precomp_with_epi_isincl; assumption.
- apply is_merely_split_monic_weq_precomp_is_surjection.
assumption.
Qed.
Definition of a split epimorphism.
It is a morphism f such that there exists a morphism g that satisfies f ∘ g = id
An epi with a chosen retraction
Definition is_split_epi (f : C⟦A,B⟧) :=
∑ (g : C⟦B,A⟧), is_retraction g f.
Definition split_epi : UU :=
∑ f : A --> B, is_split_epi f.
Lemma split_epi_is_epi (f : A --> B) :
is_split_epi f → isEpi f.
Proof.
intros is_split.
apply (isEpi_precomp _ (pr1 is_split) f).
apply (transportf _ (!pr2 is_split)).
apply identity_isEpi.
Qed.
Definition split_epi_to_epi (f : split_epi) : Epi C A B.
Proof.
use make_Epi.
- exact (pr1 f).
- abstract (apply split_epi_is_epi; exact (pr2 f)).
Defined.
Definition is_merely_split_epi (f : A --> B) :=
∥ ∑ (g : C⟦B,A⟧), g · f = identity B ∥.
Definition merely_split_epi : UU :=
∑ (f : A --> B), is_merely_split_epi f.
Lemma isaset_merely_split_epi :
has_homsets C → isaset merely_split_epi.
Proof.
intro.
apply isaset_total2; [auto|].
intro.
apply hlevelntosn, isapropishinh.
Qed.
∑ (g : C⟦B,A⟧), is_retraction g f.
Definition split_epi : UU :=
∑ f : A --> B, is_split_epi f.
Lemma split_epi_is_epi (f : A --> B) :
is_split_epi f → isEpi f.
Proof.
intros is_split.
apply (isEpi_precomp _ (pr1 is_split) f).
apply (transportf _ (!pr2 is_split)).
apply identity_isEpi.
Qed.
Definition split_epi_to_epi (f : split_epi) : Epi C A B.
Proof.
use make_Epi.
- exact (pr1 f).
- abstract (apply split_epi_is_epi; exact (pr2 f)).
Defined.
Definition is_merely_split_epi (f : A --> B) :=
∥ ∑ (g : C⟦B,A⟧), g · f = identity B ∥.
Definition merely_split_epi : UU :=
∑ (f : A --> B), is_merely_split_epi f.
Lemma isaset_merely_split_epi :
has_homsets C → isaset merely_split_epi.
Proof.
intro.
apply isaset_total2; [auto|].
intro.
apply hlevelntosn, isapropishinh.
Qed.
For the purposes of proving a proposition, we can assume a merely split
epi has a chosen retraction.
Lemma merely_split_epi_to_split_epi {X : UU} (m : A --> B) :
isaprop X → (is_split_epi m → X) → is_merely_split_epi m → X.
Proof.
intros isx impl mere.
refine (factor_through_squash isx _ mere).
assumption.
Qed.
Lemma merely_split_epi_is_epi (f : A --> B) :
has_homsets C → is_merely_split_epi f → isEpi f.
Proof.
intros H.
apply merely_split_epi_to_split_epi.
- apply isapropisEpi; auto.
- apply split_epi_is_epi.
Qed.
End SplitEpis.
isaprop X → (is_split_epi m → X) → is_merely_split_epi m → X.
Proof.
intros isx impl mere.
refine (factor_through_squash isx _ mere).
assumption.
Qed.
Lemma merely_split_epi_is_epi (f : A --> B) :
has_homsets C → is_merely_split_epi f → isEpi f.
Proof.
intros H.
apply merely_split_epi_to_split_epi.
- apply isapropisEpi; auto.
- apply split_epi_is_epi.
Qed.
End SplitEpis.
Functors preserve merely split epimorphisms
Lemma functor_preserves_merely_split_epi {C D : precategory} (F : functor C D)
{A B : ob C} (f : C⟦A,B⟧) :
is_merely_split_epi f → is_merely_split_epi (# F f).
Proof.
apply hinhfun.
intro hf.
∃ (#F (pr1 hf)).
now rewrite <-functor_id,<- (pr2 hf), <- functor_comp.
Qed.
{A B : ob C} (f : C⟦A,B⟧) :
is_merely_split_epi f → is_merely_split_epi (# F f).
Proof.
apply hinhfun.
intro hf.
∃ (#F (pr1 hf)).
now rewrite <-functor_id,<- (pr2 hf), <- functor_comp.
Qed.
Functors preserve split epimorphisms
Lemma functor_preserves_split_epi {C D : precategory} (F : functor C D)
{A B : ob C} (f : C⟦A,B⟧) :
is_split_epi f → is_split_epi (# F f).
Proof.
intro hf.
∃ (#F (pr1 hf)).
unfold is_retraction.
now rewrite <- functor_id, <- (pr2 hf), <- functor_comp.
Qed.
Definition epis_are_split (C : precategory) :=
∏ (A B : C) (f : C⟦A,B⟧), isEpi f → is_merely_split_epi f.
Arguments split_epi {_} _ _.
Arguments merely_split_epi {_} _ _.
{A B : ob C} (f : C⟦A,B⟧) :
is_split_epi f → is_split_epi (# F f).
Proof.
intro hf.
∃ (#F (pr1 hf)).
unfold is_retraction.
now rewrite <- functor_id, <- (pr2 hf), <- functor_comp.
Qed.
Definition epis_are_split (C : precategory) :=
∏ (A B : C) (f : C⟦A,B⟧), isEpi f → is_merely_split_epi f.
Arguments split_epi {_} _ _.
Arguments merely_split_epi {_} _ _.