Library UniMath.MoreFoundations.Propositions

Require Export UniMath.MoreFoundations.Notations.
Require Export UniMath.MoreFoundations.PartA.
Require Export UniMath.MoreFoundations.Tactics.
Require Export UniMath.MoreFoundations.DecidablePropositions.

Local Open Scope logic.
Local Open Scope type.

Lemma ishinh_irrel {X:UU} (x:X) (x':∥X∥) : hinhpr x = x'.
Proof.
  apply proofirrelevance. apply propproperty.
Defined.

Corollary squash_to_hProp {X:UU} {Q:hProp} : ∥ X ∥ → (X → Q) → Q.
Proof. intros h f. exact (hinhuniv f h). Defined.

Lemma hdisj_impl_1 {P Q : hProp} : P∨Q → (Q→P) → P.
Proof.
  intros o f. apply (squash_to_hProp o).
  intros [p|q].
  - exact p.
  - exact (f q).
Defined.

Lemma hdisj_impl_2 {P Q : hProp} : P∨Q → (P→Q) → Q.
Proof.
  intros o f. apply (squash_to_hProp o).
  intros [p|q].
  - exact (f p).
  - exact q.
Defined.

Definition weqlogeq (P Q : hProp) : (P = Q) ≃ (P ⇔ Q).
Proof.
  intros.
  apply weqimplimpl.
  - intro e. induction e. apply isrefl_logeq.
  - intro c. apply hPropUnivalence.
    + exact (pr1 c).
    + exact (pr2 c).
  - apply isasethProp.
  - apply propproperty.
Defined.

Lemma decidable_proof_by_contradiction {P:hProp} : decidable P → ¬ ¬ P → P.
Proof.
  intros dec nnp. induction dec as [p|np].
  - exact p.
  - apply fromempty. exact (nnp np).
Defined.

Lemma proof_by_contradiction {P:hProp} : LEM → ¬ ¬ P → P.
Proof.
  intro lem.
  exact (decidable_proof_by_contradiction (lem P)).
Defined.

Lemma dneg_elim_to_LEM : (∏ P:hProp, ¬ ¬ P → P) → LEM.
Proof.
  intros dne. intros P. simple refine (dne (_,,_) _).
  simpl. intros n.
  assert (q : ¬ (P ∨ ¬ P)).
  { now apply weqnegtonegishinh. }
  assert (r := fromnegcoprod_prop q).
  exact (pr2 r (pr1 r)).
Defined.

Lemma negforall_to_existsneg {X:UU} (P:X→hProp) : LEM → (¬ ∀ x, P x) → (∃ x, ¬ (P x)).
Proof.
  intros lem nf. apply (proof_by_contradiction lem); intro c. use nf; clear nf. intro x.
  assert (q := neghexisttoforallneg _ c x); clear c; simpl in q.
  exact (proof_by_contradiction lem q).
Defined.

Lemma negimpl_to_conj (P Q:hProp) : LEM → ( ¬ (P ⇒ Q) → P ∧ ¬ Q ).
Proof.
  intros lem ni. assert (r := negforall_to_existsneg _ lem ni); clear lem ni.
  apply (squash_to_hProp r); clear r; intros [p nq]. exact (p,,nq).
Defined.

Definition hrel_set (X : hSet) : hSet := make_hSet (hrel X) (isaset_hrel X).

Lemma isaprop_assume_it_is {X : UU} : (X → isaprop X) → isaprop X.
Proof.
  intros f. apply invproofirrelevance; intros x y.
  apply proofirrelevance. now apply f.
Defined.

Lemma isaproptotal2 {X : UU} (P : X → UU) :
  isPredicate P →
  (∏ x y : X, P x → P y → x = y) →
  isaprop (∑ x : X, P x).
Proof.
  intros HP Heq.
  apply invproofirrelevance.
  intros [x p] [y q].
  induction (Heq x y p q).
  induction (iscontrpr1 (HP x p q)).
  apply idpath.
Defined.

Lemma squash_rec {X : UU} (P : ∥ X ∥ → hProp) : (∏ x, P (hinhpr x)) → (∏ x, P x).
Proof.
  intros xp x'. simple refine (hinhuniv _ x'). intro x.
  assert (q : hinhpr x = x').
  { apply propproperty. }
  induction q. exact (xp x).
Defined.

Goal ∏ {X:UU} {P:∥X∥ → hProp} (h : ∏ x, P (hinhpr x)) (x:X),
  squash_rec _ h (hinhpr x) = h x.
Proof.
  Fail reflexivity. Abort.

Goal ∏ (X:Type)
     (P := λ x':∥X∥, ∃ x, (x' = hinhpr x))
     (h := λ x, (hinhpr (x,,idpath _) : P (hinhpr x)))
     (x:X),
  squash_rec _ h (hinhpr x) = h x.
Proof.
  Fail reflexivity. Abort.

Lemma logeq_if_both_true (P Q : hProp) : P → Q → ( P ⇔ Q ).
Proof.
  intros p q.
  split.
  - intros _. exact q.
  - intros _. exact p.
Defined.

Lemma logeq_if_both_false (P Q : hProp) : ¬P → ¬Q → ( P ⇔ Q ).
Proof.
  intros np nq.
  split.
  - intros p. apply fromempty. exact (np p).
  - intros q. apply fromempty. exact (nq q).
Defined.

Definition proofirrelevance_hProp (X : hProp) : isProofIrrelevant X
  := proofirrelevance X (propproperty X).

Ltac induction_hProp x y := induction (proofirrelevance_hProp _ x y).

Definition iscontr_hProp (X:UU) : hProp := make_hProp (iscontr X) (isapropiscontr X).

Notation "'∃!' x .. y , P"
  := (iscontr_hProp (∑ x, .. (∑ y, P) ..))
       (at level 200, x binder, y binder, right associativity) : logic.

Section hProp_logic.

Lemma islogeqassochconj {P Q R : hProp} : (P ∧ Q) ∧ R ↔ P ∧ (Q ∧ R).
Proof.
split.
- intros PQR.
  exact (pr1 (pr1 PQR),,(pr2 (pr1 PQR),,pr2 PQR)).
- intros PQR.
  exact ((pr1 PQR,,pr1 (pr2 PQR)),,pr2 (pr2 PQR)).
Defined.

Lemma islogeqcommhconj {P Q : hProp} : P ∧ Q ↔ Q ∧ P.
Proof.
split.
- intros PQ.
  exact (pr2 PQ,,pr1 PQ).
- intros QP.
  exact (pr2 QP,,pr1 QP).
Defined.

Lemma islogeqassochdisj {P Q R : hProp} : (P ∨ Q) ∨ R ↔ P ∨ (Q ∨ R).
Proof.
split.
- apply hinhuniv; intros hPQR.
  induction hPQR as [hPQ|hR].
  + use (hinhuniv _ hPQ); clear hPQ; intros hPQ.
    induction hPQ as [hP|hQ].
    × exact (hinhpr (ii1 hP)).
    × exact (hinhpr (ii2 (hinhpr (ii1 hQ)))).
  + exact (hinhpr (ii2 (hinhpr (ii2 hR)))).
- apply hinhuniv; intros hPQR.
  induction hPQR as [hP|hQR].
  + exact (hinhpr (ii1 (hinhpr (ii1 hP)))).
  + use (hinhuniv _ hQR); clear hQR; intros hQR.
    induction hQR as [hQ|hR].
    × exact (hinhpr (ii1 (hinhpr (ii2 hQ)))).
    × exact (hinhpr (ii2 hR)).
Defined.

Lemma islogeqhconj_absorb_hdisj {P Q : hProp} : P ∧ (P ∨ Q) ↔ P.
Proof.
split.
- intros hPPQ; apply (pr1 hPPQ).
- intros hP.
  split; [ apply hP | apply (hinhpr (ii1 hP)) ].
Defined.

Lemma islogeqhdisj_absorb_hconj {P Q : hProp} : P ∨ (P ∧ Q) ↔ P.
Proof.
split.
- apply hinhuniv; intros hPPQ.
  induction hPPQ as [hP|hPQ].
  + exact hP.
  + exact (pr1 hPQ).
- intros hP; apply (hinhpr (ii1 hP)).
Defined.

Lemma islogeqhfalse_hdisj {P : hProp} : ∅ ∨ P ↔ P.
Proof.
split.
- apply hinhuniv; intros hPPQ.
  induction hPPQ as [hF|hP].
  + induction hF.
  + exact hP.
- intros hP; apply (hinhpr (ii2 hP)).
Defined.

Lemma islogeqhhtrue_hconj {P : hProp} : htrue ∧ P ↔ P.
Proof.
split.
- intros hP; apply (pr2 hP).
- intros hP.
  split; [ apply tt | apply hP ].
Defined.

Lemma isassoc_hconj (P Q R : hProp) : ((P ∧ Q) ∧ R) = (P ∧ (Q ∧ R)).
Proof.
now apply hPropUnivalence; apply islogeqassochconj.
Qed.

Lemma iscomm_hconj (P Q : hProp) : (P ∧ Q) = (Q ∧ P).
Proof.
now apply hPropUnivalence; apply islogeqcommhconj.
Qed.

Lemma isassoc_hdisj (P Q R : hProp) : ((P ∨ Q) ∨ R) = (P ∨ (Q ∨ R)).
Proof.
now apply hPropUnivalence; apply islogeqassochdisj.
Qed.

Lemma iscomm_hdisj (P Q : hProp) : (P ∨ Q) = (Q ∨ P).
Proof.
now apply hPropUnivalence; apply islogeqcommhdisj.
Qed.

Lemma hconj_absorb_hdisj (P Q : hProp) : (P ∧ (P ∨ Q)) = P.
Proof.
now apply hPropUnivalence; apply islogeqhconj_absorb_hdisj.
Qed.

Lemma hdisj_absorb_hconj (P Q : hProp) : (P ∨ (P ∧ Q)) = P.
Proof.
now apply hPropUnivalence; apply islogeqhdisj_absorb_hconj.
Qed.

Lemma hfalse_hdisj (P : hProp) : (∅ ∨ P) = P.
Proof.
now apply hPropUnivalence; apply islogeqhfalse_hdisj.
Qed.

Lemma htrue_hconj (P : hProp) : (htrue ∧ P) = P.
Proof.
now apply hPropUnivalence; apply islogeqhhtrue_hconj.
Qed.

End hProp_logic.

Lemma squash_uniqueness {X} (x:X) (h:∥ X ∥) : squash_element x = h.
Proof. intros. apply propproperty. Qed.

Goal ∏ X Q (i:isaprop Q) (f:X → Q) (x:X),
   factor_through_squash i f (squash_element x) = f x.
Proof. reflexivity. Defined.

Lemma factor_dep_through_squash {X} {Q:∥ X ∥→UU} :
  (∏ h, isaprop (Q h)) →
  (∏ x, Q(squash_element x)) →
  (∏ h, Q h).
Proof.
  intros i f ?. apply (h (make_hProp (Q h) (i h))).
  intro x. simpl. induction (squash_uniqueness x h). exact (f x).
Defined.

Lemma factor_through_squash_hProp {X} : ∏ hQ:hProp, (X → hQ) → ∥ X ∥ → hQ.
Proof. intros [Q i] f h. refine (h _ _). assumption. Defined.

Lemma funspace_isaset {X Y} : isaset Y → isaset (X → Y).
Proof. intros is. apply (impredfun 2). assumption. Defined.

Lemma squash_map_uniqueness {X S} (ip : isaset S) (g g' : ∥ X ∥ → S) :
  g ∘ squash_element ¬ g' ∘ squash_element → g ¬ g'.
Proof.
  intros h.
  set ( Q := λ y, g y = g' y ).
  unfold homot.
  apply (@factor_dep_through_squash X). intros y. apply ip.
  intro x. apply h.
Qed.

Lemma squash_map_epi {X S} (ip : isaset S) (g g' : ∥ X ∥ → S) :
  g ∘ squash_element = g'∘ squash_element → g = g'.
Proof.
  intros e.
  apply funextsec.
  apply squash_map_uniqueness. exact ip.
  intro x. induction e. apply idpath.
Qed.

Lemma uniqueExists {A : UU} {P : A → UU} {a b : A}
  (Hexists : ∃! a, P a) (Ha : P a) (Hb : P b) : a = b.
Proof.
  assert (H : tpair _ _ Ha = tpair _ _ Hb).
  { now apply proofirrelevancecontr. }
  exact (base_paths _ _ H).
Defined.

Definition isConnected X : hProp := ∥ X ∥ ∧ ∀ (x y:X), ∥ x = y ∥.

Lemma predicateOnConnectedType {X:Type} (i : isConnected X) {P:X→hProp} (x0:X) (p:P x0) :
   ∏ x, P x.
Proof.
  intros x. apply (squash_to_hProp (pr2 i x x0)); intros e. now induction e.
Defined.

Definition isBaseConnected (X:PointedType) : hProp := ∀ (y:X), ∥ basepoint X = y ∥.

Lemma isConnected_isBaseConnected (X:PointedType) : isConnected X ↔ isBaseConnected X.
Proof.
  split.
  - intros [_ ic] x. use ic.
  - intros ibc. split.
    + exact (hinhpr (basepoint X)).
    + intros x y.
      apply (squash_to_hProp (ibc x)); intros p; apply (squash_to_hProp (ibc y)); intros q.
      exact (hinhpr (!p @ q)).
Defined.

Definition BasePointComponent (X:PointedType) : PointedType :=
  pointedType (∑ (y:X), ∥ basepoint X = y ∥) (basepoint X,, hinhpr (idpath (basepoint X))).

Definition basePointComponent_inclusion {X:PointedType} (x : BasePointComponent X) : X
  := pr1 x.

Lemma BasePointComponent_isBaseConnected (X:PointedType) : isBaseConnected (BasePointComponent X).
Proof.
  intros [x' c'].
  change (basepoint (BasePointComponent X))
    with (tpair (λ (y:X), ∥ basepoint X = y ∥) (basepoint X) (hinhpr (idpath (basepoint X)))).
  use (hinhfun _ c'); intro q. induction q.
  apply maponpaths. apply propproperty.
Defined.

Lemma BasePointComponent_isincl {X:PointedType} : isincl (@basePointComponent_inclusion X).
Proof.
  use isinclpr1. intros x. apply propproperty.
Defined.

Lemma BasePointComponent_isweq {X:PointedType} (bc : isBaseConnected X) :
  isweq (@basePointComponent_inclusion X).
Proof.
  use isweqpr1.
  intros x.
  apply iscontraprop1.
  - apply propproperty.
  - exact (bc x).
Defined.

Definition BasePointComponent_weq {X:PointedType} (bc : isBaseConnected X) :
  BasePointComponent X ≃ X
  := make_weq (@basePointComponent_inclusion X) (BasePointComponent_isweq bc).

Lemma baseConnectedness X : isBaseConnected X → isConnected X.
Proof.
  intros p. split.
  - exact (hinhpr (basepoint X)).
  - intros x y. assert (a := p x); assert (b := p y); clear p.
    apply (squash_to_prop a); [apply propproperty|]; clear a; intros a.
    apply (squash_to_prop b); [apply propproperty|]; clear b; intros b.
    apply hinhpr. exact (!a@b).
Defined.

Lemma predicateOnBaseConnectedType (X:PointedType) (b:isBaseConnected X)
      (P:X→hProp) (p:P (basepoint X)) :
   ∏ x, P x.
Proof.
  intros x. apply (squash_to_hProp (b x)); intros e. now induction e.
Defined.

Goal ∏ (X:PointedType) (b:isBaseConnected X) (P:X→hProp) (p:P (basepoint X)),
       predicateOnBaseConnectedType X b P p (basepoint X) = p.
Proof.
  Fail reflexivity.
  intros.
Abort.

Lemma predicateOnBasePointComponent
      (X:PointedType) (X' := BasePointComponent X) (pt' := basepoint X')
      (P:X'→hProp) (p:P pt') :
   ∏ x, P x.
Proof.
  intros x.
  apply (squash_to_hProp (BasePointComponent_isBaseConnected _ x)); intros e.
  now induction e.
Defined.

Goal ∏ (X:PointedType)
     (X' := BasePointComponent X) (pt' := basepoint X')
     (P:X'→hProp) (p:P pt'),
   predicateOnBasePointComponent X P p pt' = p.
Proof.
  Fail reflexivity.
  intros.
  unfold pt', basepoint, X', BasePointComponent, pointedType, pr2; cbn beta.
Abort.